Friday, December 27, 2013

I have a little experience dongfeng venezuela to report. Spent in front of a store and went to ask

Ugly woman has no place in the company is that right? | Fabio Hernandez
It was time that I was not interested in a print magazine. I scanned in media consumption, dongfeng venezuela fortunately or unfortunately, the role was restricted, for me, for reading books. Journal, those ink stain hands, no longer sure what is. In 2009, hooked me perhaps more than it should. But even swimming in the virtual expanse, a paper magazine stopped me like the old days when the pages exercised a fascination over me almost sexual: Vice. I liked the boldness of the editorial project, the plastic beauty of the whole, reports of spirit. Not every publication dongfeng venezuela that has the courage to publish the pictures of Richard Kern, a New York that produces images so erotic that most moralistic and rigid minds could classify them as pornographic. A good magazine is in the details, and Vice has, for example, noted a small section of the clothing's and don'ts and contemporary attitudes.
It is a magazine distributed free in stores from American Apparel clothing network. I read recently about the owner of American Apparel, Dov Charney. I also saw an interview with an American radio station, and then I understood everything. Charney is the explanation dongfeng venezuela for the formula of Vice and American Apparel, an extraordinary and rapid success in the business world in the United States. It is a loved and admired by many guy, and love others dongfeng venezuela loathe it.
I saw several times in a website, it is called a perv, pervert. That's because he has in his room photos of topless women, photographed by himself. Charney stimulates your company in a liberal culture, seen from the point of sex. Many employees pose for the provocative American Apparel dongfeng venezuela ads, and with his beard faun Charney admits that already slept with several employees. In a politically correct environment like the United States, where there are no longer blind and visually impaired but not black but African Americans, Charney demonstrates, perhaps even irresponsible epic courage.
He was recently stoned because your company does not want ugly women in his paintings. There is an impact on earnings, profits, dongfeng venezuela arguably. I do not think weird. Not for a company whose employees pose half-naked for advertising campaigns. Beautiful preference for advanced research in the department of stem cell Planetary dongfeng venezuela Institute Salvation of Lost Cases would be weird. But a string like American Apparel makes sense. Beauty in this case is critical.
I have a little experience dongfeng venezuela to report. Spent in front of a store and went to ask for a copy. A beautiful and delicate clerk handed me a newspaper. I asked if there were old copies, and she said no. I was some 50 meters from the store when I see someone running towards me. Was the attendant, who had found an old edition and made sure to give myself. In it were breathless grace that made my day but cold.
This entry was posted on 16/12/2009 at 22:34 and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a comment, or trackback from your own site. 22 Responses to "ugly woman has no time in the company that's right?" Anarcoplayba Says: 16/12/2009 at 23:23 | Reply
In a "trusted relationships" a law firm placed an ad looking for a desk: more than 1.70, less than 65 kg, preferably blonde, single, and "liberal". The job description was to coordinate schedules, meet customers, dongfeng venezuela travel arrangements and on average 3-6 times a week, having sexual intercourse with the owners of the office.
Okay No hypocrisy: we all know that physical beauty is an immediate dongfeng venezuela difference. It is a business card. The mere fact that you are "aesthetically pleasing" already gives you a head start it would be naive not be tapped.
However, I think the line between acceptable cross inaceitávelfoi when it ceased to be an attitude of "smartness" of candidates and became a requirement imposed by the picker.
Come on: Everyone knows that some professions have specific requirements as "good looking", but without hypocrisy of wanting to disguise it in a "search for yield". Alice Barros Says: 17/12/2009 at 05:03 | Reply
Unfortunately the maximum Vinicius proceeds. Poor that they do not fit the standards of beauty imposed. Often the role of women comes down to life and pleasing sight of men and of course to decorate room with beautiful paintings. Karina says: 17/12/2009 at 00:41 | Reply
Right for whom? For the company? If it is private, the criteria appear within a reasonable limit. For employees? Only candidate who wants to. For excluded? Will find a company that values your talent

No comments:

Post a Comment