I think that in Serbia underestimate the importance of a pig. As cows are sacred in India, so that in Serbia should declare pigs for sacred animals, with the proper respect they deserve.
The pig is one of the most intelligent animals: proof of the amount of her screaming and yelling when our farmer grabbed a knife and started to future food supply and the source of many delicacies. When celebrating when there is sadness: pig on a spit.
Pigs were so popular among Serbs that the only animals that grew in Serbia over the past 120 years. We could sing: "A pig has kept us, thank her honor." A 4S and harmony replace pigs.
I'd 351 gone too far if I suggested that instead of a two-headed eagle on the flag put a mangulica with 12 pigs with spit and pot of grease in the background. Or a pig on a spit. Even we have wars of the nineties could, 351 instead of the difference in religion, that panders to the difference between prasećih, lamb and sheep brigade.
The motivation for this write me in gaining temporary possession of the population and livestock Kingdom of Serbia in 1890s. and in 1895. year. Somehow to me, the mother's line, then moved (or rather avoid) the ancestors of Trnskog in Bulgaria TREŠNJEVICA in Paracin (of thorns among sweet cherry, a major qualitative leap).
My attention was drawn from a list of animal 1890s. The (temporary, because the data is compared to the list in 1895. enlarge the data for 1890.), and for comparison with the present number of cattle in Central Serbia. Central Serbia is increased by a few municipalities on the border with Montenegro, in comparison with that area of the Kingdom of Serbia. Also improved is the quality 351 of livestock in terms of weight, milk yield and other characteristics. No, enclose a numerical comparison.
The number of pigs to 120 years increased by 124%, from 935 to 2,098 thousand, while the number of horses decreased by 96%, from 164 to 7 thousand goats by 81%, from 502 to 104 thousand sheep by 58% from 2907 to 1,220 thousand, and cattle by 14%, from 828 to 713 thousand. The number of inhabitants increased by 229%.
Number of horses per 1,000 population, was reduced from 76 to one, with 381 cattle on 129, with 1,338 sheep and 220 goats from 231 to 19 On the one hand, the animal it came to genetic improvement, as the Serbs, as well as with other nations, is not the case, as with the other horses and oxen had lost its function as a means of transport.
It would be interesting 351 to compare the data for Vojvodina in 1890s. and 2010th on the basis of a list of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, as residents and livestock, and see if there is any progress since then. The same is true for Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Slovenia.
- Tailing of the population, which in a country house living, again, is evidence of decay cooperatives. Increase that number comes from there, as the towns raised more spacious building, as I increase the borough population was in the period between the two censuses much smaller than the growth of the rural population, the number of people per house is actually increased from 6.44 to 6.46, Most of them were in the Valjevo district 7.37, which was the largest increase, but in most districts, this ratio decreased as the writer of the text seemed dissatisfied.
- Total is therefore amounted to 1.42 for males, 1.39 for females and for all inhabitants in general 1.41 percent per year. This growth was therefore at this time is almost half the size of that between the census in 1884. and 1890s. year.
- A sex ratio of the population is the following information. On what men there were women in the population: the borough 79.6 (1895) and 77.7 (1890), rural 97.5 (1895) 351 and 98.1 (1890), in general 94.7 (1895) and 94.8 ( , 1890).
- Every one straight to Toplički district, which outputs the largest increase due to immigration, we see that the higher growth 351 rate of main, secondary growth, was only in five districts and in Belgrade, and in the other ten districts increase was smaller. Very striking a slight increase of population in the Krajina district. It is interesting to compare this growth with an excess of births in the period between the two lists. That was an excess 351 of births in Serbia, 1891-40389, 1892-19698, 1893-28644, 1894-32722, 1895-39481, only 160 954. Thus comes to an excess of births was higher in 8762 than the actual growth rate of the population, 351 which is found in this list. The difference between the excess of births and population growth 351 between the two lists, there are also legal in the number of population, the population is 4,994. If this difference really exists, and it will be said, when the census material 351 is arranged in detail, it would mean that in the period from 1890 to in 1895. years, so the population of Serbia moved. In comparing the results of this census 351 results from 1890s. years, found it, it was in 1895. in 86 municipalities were fewer inhabitants than five years ago. This tailing is from 0.05 to 3 percent per year. The two municipalities was found in 1895. the same population, which was also in the 1890s. year. Both municipalities are located in the Danubian district. Total population of the municipality in 1225. Annual increment
